I thought it may be useful to do a round up of stuff every week or so. We will see whether I keep this going...
The British Chiropractic Association v Simon Singh
The deadline for Simon Singh to file his application for appeal has been extended (I understand) until 8 June 2009. I don't believe there is anything exceptional in this, and such extensions are common in litigation.
I plan to do a substantive follow up to the BCA's extraordinary press release in the next week or so.
The Promotion of Chiropractic
Making complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority or to Trading Standards, or indeed to individual chiropractors, is not really my sort of thing. However, other bloggers and campaigners take a more robust view, and they are fully entitled to do so.
And it is interesting to watch what is happening.
Martin Robbins at the The Lay Scientist has been in correspondence with Russell Dean, Director of Windsor Remedy Centre.
I am not sure Mr Dean intended to write such an entertaining and telling response to Martin's initial email.
I was particularly interested in Mr Dean's implied suggestion that, because websites are outside the scope of the ASA, he had no reason to address Martin's concerns about statements contained on his site. But, as Martin points out, the position under the General Chiropractic Council's Code of Practice may not be as easily sidestepped as that.
To which I can add that the Unfair Commercial Practices Regulations, which are enforced by local Trading Standards or the Office of Fair Trading, will in any case apply in full to any commercial practice, whether it is on the internet or otherwise.
When Martin introduced himself before asking a question at the recent Simon Singh Support Rally he received a spontaneous peel of applause. He looked genuinely shocked, but it was richly deserved.
As well as Martin's exploits, do keep track of JDC325's similar engagement with Bassett Chiropractic Clinic
#####
Addition: now also see another blogger's exchange with Oxford Chiropractic Clinic.
#####
Simon Singh Support Rally
Extended video footage featuring Simon Singh, Dave Gorman, Nick Cohen, Prof Brian Cox, and Dr Evan Harris, at the Simon Singh Support Rally can now be found here.
There are also the messages of support from Prof Richard Wiseman, James Randi & Phil Plait of the JREF, and Dr Ben Goldacre, as well as a message of greeting from Dave Morris of the McLibel 2.
These videos were filmed by Nick Pullar and edited by Crispian Jago.
Beyond Singh and Chiropractic
Once upon a time this Blog dealt with other things, and this will happen again soon, as (I hope) a new self-standing website is in development to carry information on the case and to provide resources for the ongoing scrutiny of the British Chiropractic Association and chiropractors generally.
This new website would never have happened without this misconceived libel case and may be best seen as a lasting monument to the BCA's "Chiropractic Awareness Week".
Then, unless some silly CAM practitioner (or psychic or similar) decides to bring a libel case in response to what I view as legitimate criticism and scrutiny (and if so, expect fully in turn the anxious scrutiny of this Blog), I plan to move on to cover other abuses of law, especially intellectual property rights and police powers.
Recommended Blogs
I would like to recommend a couple of Blogs this week.
First, Dr Petra Boynton writes a favourite Blog of mine, and in my view is to media stories about sex and relationships what Ben Goldacre is to Bad Science.
Dr Boynton is also a longstanding supporter of Simon Singh and an eminent supporter on the ever growing Facebook Group.
Second, the incomparable Gimpy, who is rightly considered by mainstream journalists as a first rate investigative writer. If for some reason you have missed Gimpy's outstanding work so far, click and enjoy his stuff on Bad Science and the excesses of complementary and alternative medicine.
Saturday, 30 May 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

13 comments:
I'd like to say thanks to JoK for the work he is putting into this blog. It's always hard for an outsider in any field to get to grips with terminology and what is really happening while to an insider it's all obvious.
You explain things very well sir.
Thanks
Martin
Just to clarify the ASA matter ....
The ASA will take complaints about adverts on websites for other companies; it won't take complaints about stuff on a company's own website about its own business - "point of sale" stuff (roughly speaking).
So if a chiropractor posts ads on Google or another third party site, they have to abide by the rules on honesty etc.
Please do keep this going! We're listening. And it's important not to let awareness fade as this drags on.
You are generous in your praise, although I'm afraid my blog has been a little quiet of late - not for much longer, things are brewing.
I echo Martin's compliments, the law has always been something of a mystery to me and sometimes dismissed as something that happens to other people. However, Simon Singh's unfortunate experience has made me realise that I really should learn more about how it can affect me and my blogging, it is a highly educative experience reading your blog.
The NICE recommendations on the treatment of low back pain have been published. After all the research, the conclusion is to recommend chiropractic,osteopathy and acupuncture care for low back pain. This would be under the NHS. Does it not send warning bells to everybody? Is it possible that the previous treatment they may have received, e.g. physiotherapy modalities, heat, ultrasound etc may have been in itself unscientific and untenable. Physiotherapists have known for years that ultrasound was ineffective for low back pain, yet continued to use it and teach the use of it. Is this honest?, is it tenable?, is it bogus? We should be asking the question of all practitioners of neuro-musculo-skeletal medicine (physiotherapists, medical practitioners and orthopaedists), "Show us your evidence"? You will be appalled at the evidence provided by them.
It seems relavant that the first two chiropractic practices that I phoned last Wednesday offered some very dubious advice about the treatment of colic and asthma (read the conversations at http://www.dcscience.net/?p=1542).
Oddly enough, both practices were members of the group run by the chairman of the General Chiropractic Council, Peter Dixon. That is the same Peter Dixon who was a member of the NICE guidance group which just recommended that chiropractic should be avaialable in the NHS.
Well, well. What an odd coincidence.
I echo what Gimpy said about the law and blogging. Regardless of the outcome of Simon's case, we all need to be more aware of where we stand.
...and what better excuse to pimp my new blog, Zeno's Blog.
All it really has at the moment are reposts of what I've said on my Think Humanism forum, but they are now easier to read all in one place. I hope to continue it on this and other topics.
Many thanks for the kind words - I was genuinely surprised, and it was a great meeting :)
I'd just like to echo the others here - it is hugely beneficial to the rest of us to have somebody of your experience here translating legalese for us.
Thanks for a very interesting blog.
While we all feel sympathy towards Simon Singh, I'd imagine most of us feel a bit powerless to help. So, here's a discussion point that you might like to raise with your readers (forgive me if this has been suggested before):
There is a Chiropractor's "surgery" close to where I stay. They specifically advertise, in their window, that they offer treatment for colic in babies. Given all the shenanigans recently, my awareness of this has been heightened and the pedant in me wants to complain. The "surgery" in question has affiliation to the BCA and the Scottish equivalent and, while the advert in their shop window is not (as I understand it) within the remit of the ASA, trading standards could still be contacted. You've pointed this out here already.
I wonder if we have enough annoyed people around the UK to mount a concerted campaign? If a large percentage of BCA members received complaints about their advertisement of treatments for colic (for example) we might provoke a response.
Graeme
There are a number of us working working towards this. See the latest post on my blog at www.zenosblog.com. I hope to post more later this week.
Thanks for that info - I'll keep a look there.
What we need is some exposure to a large number of people in the blogosphere (I got to you through Richard Dawkins's website, and New Humanist) and to make it easy for people to complain: e.g. template letters.
With those two ingredients, it should be possible to create a groundswell of public discontent.
This should, at the very least, be quite annoying for chiropractors at large! and they'll only have hemseves to blame by the BCA pursuing this (what I believe to be) silly case.
Thanks again.
There are going to be more han one casualty over this whole issue. One will be the pharmaceutical companies, who in their packaging, use symptoms such as coughs, cold, headaches, etc. Research has shown that Over The Counter medications such as these do not work for the symptoms described. In fact some of them are dangerous. I am sure there will be a lot of CEO's of pharmaceutical companies looking at this case wondering how it will affect them. It will not be good.
If RCT's are the gold standard for research, why have none ever been done for the treatment of appendicitis. I would not like to be the poor person in the "no treatment" group.
I'm not sure that the word "casualty" has the right connotations here.
None of us want to see legitimate businesses becoming "casualties". To quote the TV advert: we just want things to do what they say on the tin.
Post a Comment