Last week, to my surprise, I spent a lot of time blogging about riots.
On Sunday I wrote a post here about how the difficulty in predicting a riot never translates into reluctance by pundits in explaining why they occurred (usually in accordance with the views they already hold).
On Monday at the New Statesman, I warned of the sentimentality one will encounter with those with partisan views on rioters and the police.
On Tuesday, again at the New Statesman, I urged that the riots needed to be kept in proportion, and on Thursday I argued that one need not panic and one should instead treat the offences as normally as possible. In between, partly in response to my friend Evan Harris, I blogged here that the army should not be brought in. And today I also blogged here that the key to explaining casual unlawful behaviour is to look at attitudes to law.
But my most popular post of the last week was none of the above. It was a post at the New Statesmanabout a riot that didn't happen.
However, I have no wish to become an inverse Laurie Penny: with me playing down the politico-socio-economic significance of civil disturbances and reporting regularly on outbreaks of civil peace. So that may be all the riot reportage I will ever do.
The legal podcast Without Prejudice goes from strength to strength. This week's special was my favourite one yet, with regulars Charon QC and Carl Gardner (and me) joined by human rights barrister Adam Wagner, experienced criminal lawyer David Wales, and Evan Harris providing a broader policy perspective. If you haven't listened to it yet, please do download it and give it a try. We have great hopes for this podcast series.
Outiside of blogging, podcasting, and work as a practising lawyer, I have made a renewed go at the (wretched) book. This one will be on privacy law in the round - not just hacking and celebrity injunctions - and it is already going better than the aborted libel book and the slow-moving wider 'Bad Law' book. Let's see if I get any further with it. To do so I may have to stay off that awful time-eater, Twitter, as much as I can, as I like the idea of finishing and publishing an actual book...
No purely anonymous comments will be published; always use a name for ease of reference by other commenters.